Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Arq. bras. oftalmol ; 81(5): 371-375, Sept.-Oct. 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-950483

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the bacterial and fungal microbiota found in contact lens cases among two groups of patients to correlate the data on the habits of contact lens users and to evaluate whether there is a difference in the culture results between users of ridged and nonridged contact lens cases. Methods: Two groups (35 patients per group) were included, consisting of hospital workers and those who had not visited a hospital in the past 30 days, and a questionnaire regarding epidemiological data and habits related to contact lens and lens case use was administered. In addition, 140 samples collected from the right and left compartments of each lens case by swabbing the bottom of the wells were tested using bacterioscopy as well as fungal and bacterial cultures via computerized identification of the species. Results: No fungal growth was identified in any of the 70 contact lens cases; however, bacteria were found in 39 cases, and there was no statistical difference between the groups. Most bacteria (>85%) were gram-negative bacilli. Contamination inone compartment of the contact lens case elevated the risk of contamination of the other side (>80%). Moreover, contamination was statistically higher in the ridged cases than in nonridged cases (p=0.0149). Conclusion: The types of bacteria contaminating the cases are generally not seen in eye diseases associated with contact lens use, suggesting that other decisive variables are involved in eye infection from a contaminated lens or case. Fungal contamination of contact lens cases appears to be an exception. Ridged cases are commonly used by contact lens wearers and present a potential risk to eye health. In addition, the results of bacterial tests between hospital workers and those who did not visit a hospital were not significantly different.


RESUMO Objetivo: O objetivo deste trabalho foi analisar a microbiota bacteriana e fúngica encontrada em estojos de lentes de contato em dois grupos, correlacionar os dados sobre os hábitos de uso de lentes de contato e avaliar se há diferença na positividade das culturas entre os usuários estojos de lentes de contato com ranhuras e sem ranhuras. Métodos: Dois grupos foram formados, trabalhadores do hospital e pessoas que não visitaram o hospital (35 indivíduos por grupo), e um questionário foi aplicado sobre dados epidemiológicos e hábitos relacionados ao uso de lentes de contato e estojos de lentes. Além disso, 140 amostras, coletadas do compartimento direito e esquerdo de cada estojo de lente, esfregando o fundo dos mesmos, foram testadas por bacterioscopia e por culturas de fungos e bactérias, com identificação computadorizada da espécie. Resultados: Não houve crescimento fúngico em nenhum dos 70 estojos de lentes de contato, porém bactérias foram encontradas em 39; não houve diferença estatística entre os grupos. A maioria das bactérias (>85%) eram bacilos gram-negativos. Quando um compartimento estava contaminado, o risco de contaminação do outro compartimento era elevado (>80%). A contaminação foi estatisticamente maior nos estojos com ranhuras (p=0,0149). Conclusão: A contaminação dos estojos parece ocorrer por bactérias que, em geral, não são encontradas em doenças oculares associadas ao uso de lentes de contato, sugerindo que existem outras variáveis decisivas nas infecções oculares de uma lente ou estojo contaminado. Contaminação de estojos de lentes de contato com fungos parece ser uma exceção. O uso de estojos com ranhuras é uma prática comum e apresenta um risco potencial à saúde ocular. Não foram encontradas diferenças significativas nos resultados dos testes bacterianos entre trabalhadores hospitalares e pessoas que não visitaram o hospital.


Subject(s)
Humans , Equipment Contamination/statistics & numerical data , Contact Lenses/microbiology , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires , Fungi/isolation & purification , Gram-Negative Bacteria/classification , Gram-Positive Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Bacteria/classification
3.
MEAJO-Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology. 2011; 18 (3): 228-231
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-130061

ABSTRACT

To evaluate the resistance or susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the most common pathogen in contact lens keratitis and corneal ulcer, to different antibiotic regimens. This cross-sectional study included all patients with recently diagnosed contact lens corneal ulcer whose culture results were positive for P. aeruginosa, from March 2009 to March 2010. The empirical antibiotic therapy was changed to appropriate antibiotics according to the culture results, provided that satisfactory clinical improvement was not achieved with the initial antibiotic regimen. The overall sensitivity or resistance of P. aeruginosa to the most commonly used antibiotics was assessed based on the results of the antibiograms. Fifty-two patients [43 females and 9 males] were included. Forty-five patients [86%] were wearing cosmetic contact lenses, while 7 patients [14%] were using therapeutic contact lenses. Thirty-nine patients [75%] were hospitalized and13 patients [25%] were followed up through an outpatient clinic. Thirty patients [58%] had central ulcers, whereas 22 patients [42%] had peripheral ulcers. Twelve patients [23%] had hypopyon in their first exam. The mean time to diagnose the ulcer after the last time wearing was 2 days [range: 12 hours to 5 days]. AMT was required for 10 patients [19%]. Based on the antibiograms, PA was shown to be sensitive in 100% of cases to ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin. Amikacin, imipenem, and gentamicin were the second most effective antibiotics. P. aeruginosa was highly sensitive to ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, and amikacin. All cases were resistant to cefazolin. Resistance to multiple antibiotics might be a significant concern in patients with corneal ulcers. In referral centers dealing with corneal ulcers, the initial antibiotic regimens should be changed from time to time to prevent this phenomenon


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Contact Lenses/microbiology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Resistance, Bacterial
4.
Arq. bras. oftalmol ; 72(2): 261-263, mar.-abr. 2009. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-513903

ABSTRACT

Relatamos um caso de conjuntivite ocasionada por Achromobacter xylosoxidans em paciente imunocompetente usuária de lentes de contato rígidas. A bactéria foi isolada da solução utilizada para a desinfecção das lentes bem como do raspado conjuntival. A. xylosoxidans tem sido descrita em infecções oportunistas em pacientes imunodeprimidos, contudo pode ser confundida com outros bacilos gram-negativos, principalmente Pseudomonas aeruginosa, isoladas de infecções oculares em pacientes imunocompetentes. Devido ao reduzido perfil de sensibilidade aos antimicrobianos demonstrado pelo A. xylosoxidans, torna-se importante a identificação deste agente etiológico em quadros de conjuntivite.


We report here a case of conjunctivitis in an immunocompetent patient due to Achromobacter xylosoxidans, which was associated with the use of rigid contact lenses. The bacteria were isolated from the scraped conjunctival swab as well as from the lens cleaning fluid. A. xylosoxidans is an opportunistic pathogen, especially in immunocompromised patients; however, in isolates of ocular infections, from immunocompetent patients, it may be confused with other gram-negative organisms, particularly Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Due to an increased resistance against different antimicrobial agents, A. xylosoxidans must be fully identified and differentiated from other gram-negative isolates from ocular infections.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Young Adult , Achromobacter denitrificans/isolation & purification , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/microbiology , Contact Lenses/microbiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Aza Compounds/therapeutic use , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Contact Lenses/adverse effects , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Immunocompetence , Quinolines/therapeutic use , Young Adult
5.
Arq. bras. oftalmol ; 71(6,supl.0): 9-13, nov.-dez. 2008.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-507467

ABSTRACT

A correta manutenção das lentes de contato é fundamental para se obter sucesso e manter a continuidade de seu uso. É grande o número de pacientes que abandonam o uso de suas lentes por problemas que poderiam ser solucionados com tratamentos relativamente simples ou com uma orientação mais adequada. O mau uso das lentes, associado à má adaptação, contaminação, doenças oculares prévias e fatores ambientais, podem aumentar o número de infecções corneanas através da proliferação de microorganismos. O presente artigo visa apresentar as atualizações em relação aos cuidados e manutenção com as lentes de contato.


The proper maintenance of contact lenses is crucial for their success and to maintain the continuity of their use. Many patients abandon the use of their lenses due to problems that could be solved with relatively simple treatments. The misuse of lenses, coupled with poor adjustment, contamination, eye disease and environmental factors may increase the number of corneal infections through the proliferation of microorganisms. This article aims to provide contact lens care and maintenance updates.


Subject(s)
Humans , Contact Lenses , Disinfection/methods , Keratitis/prevention & control , Contact Lens Solutions/classification , Contact Lens Solutions/pharmacology , Contact Lenses/microbiology , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control
6.
Arq. bras. oftalmol ; 71(6,supl.0): 32-36, nov.-dez. 2008. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-507471

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Contact lens-associated microbial keratitis is a severe condition with sight-threatening potential and increasing incidence. Information regarding the etiological agents is essential in guiding management and may vary geographically. The aim of this study was to analyze the microbiological results of corneal scrapings collected from patients presenting with contact lens-associated microbial keratitis. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the records of all patients who were clinically diagnosed with contact lens-associated microbial keratitis and had corneal scrapings sent to the Laboratory of Ocular Microbiology, UNIFESP/EPM during a 5-year period from January 2002 to December 2007. RESULTS: The etiological agent was identified in 239 patients. Bacterial isolates accounted for 166 (69.46 percent) cases, Acanthamoeba for 95 (39.75 percent) cases and fungi for 4 (1.67 percent) cases. Among the bacterial infections, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was demonstrated in 74 cases, while Pseudomonas spp was found in 32 patients. All coagulase negative Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas were susceptible to ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin. Resistance to gentamicin was documented in a single case of Pseudomonas. Fourth-generation flouoroquinolone resistance was not observed among Pseudomonas cases. CONCLUSION: Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was the most frequent isolate, and such data must be considered when determining empiric treatment. Second-generation fluoroquinolones ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin and fourth-generation fluoroquinolones moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin showed a good antibacterial profile and therefore could be good options for initial management.


OBJETIVO: A ceratite microbiana associada ao uso de lente de contato é uma condição clínica grave, com risco de perda visual e cuja incidência vem aumentando progressivamente. Os principais agentes etiológicos podem variar geograficamente e informações referentes aos agentes causais são essenciais para tratamento apropriado. Este estudo se propõe a analisar os resultados microbiológicos de raspados de córnea coletados de pacientes usuários de lente de contato com quadro de ceratite microbiana. MÉTODOS: Foi realizada análise retrospectiva de todos os estudos microbiológicos de pacientes usuários de lente de contato com diagnóstico clínico de ceratite microbiana que tiveram material corneal enviado para o Laboratório de Microbiologia Ocular UNIFESP durante o período de 5 anos de janeiro de 2002 a dezembro de 2007. RESULTADOS: Dos 239 pacientes em que foi possível identificação, o agente era bactéria em 166 (69,46 por cento), Acanthamoeba em 95 (39,75 por cento) e fungo em 4 (1,67 por cento). Staphylococcus coagulase negativo foi encontrado em 74 casos, dos quais todos eram sensíveis tanto a ciprofloxacino quanto a ofloxacino. Dois casos de resistência a quinolonas de quarta geração (gatifloxacino e moxifloxacino) foram identificados entre os casos de Staphylococcus coagulase negativo. Pseudomonas spp foi isolada em 32 pacientes, dos quais todos eram sensíveis a quinolonas de segunda geração (ciprofloxacino e ofloxacino) e de quarta geração. Foi encontrado um único caso de Pseudomonas resistente a gentamicina. CONCLUSÃO: Staphylococcus coagulase negativo foi isolado em um número de casos superior a Pseudomonas, o agente tradicionalmente considerado o principal de ceratites microbianas associadas ao uso de lente de contato. Aminoglicosídeos, fluorquinolonas de segunda e de quarta geração apresentaram um perfil antibiótico satisfatório para o tratamento empírico de ceratites microbianas em usuários de lente de contato.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Contact Lenses/microbiology , Eye Infections, Bacterial/microbiology , Keratitis/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/classification , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Contact Lenses/adverse effects , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Eye Infections, Bacterial/drug therapy , Fluoroquinolones/classification , Fluoroquinolones/pharmacology , Keratitis/drug therapy , Pseudomonas/drug effects , Pseudomonas/growth & development , Retrospective Studies , Staphylococcus/drug effects , Staphylococcus/growth & development , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL